FORMATION OF CRITICAL EVALUATION OF INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET OF COLLEGE STUDENTS
Keywords:
Internet, critical thinking, levels of formation, critical evaluation of information, learning processAbstract
Article’s purpose: to identify, theoretically justify the implementation of pedagogical conditions for the formation of students’ ability to critically evaluate information on the Internet.
Methodology: development, modernization and effective use of criterion-diagnostic apparatus (criteria, indicators, levels, methods), which allows to objectively determine the level of formation of the ability to critically evaluate information on the Internet; the statement of recommendations on improvement of educational process with use of the developed model of process of formation of ability to critically estimate the information on the Internet which provides increase of efficiency of professional training of college students is substantiated.
Scientific novelty: in order to study the research process, using information, system and activity approaches, we have developed and described a structural and functional model of the process of forming in college students the ability to critically evaluate information on the Internet. The proposed model includes: normative-target, meaningful, organizational-formative and evaluation-effective blocks, the interaction of which determines the studied process and ensures its effective implementation. Significant influence on the functioning of the proposed model has a set of pedagogical conditions, which are also its structural component. Based on the theoretical analysis, we propose motivational, cognitive, activity, reflexive criteria and corresponding indicators. The levels of formation of this skill are optimal, acceptable and critical.
Conclusions: the effective formation of students ‘ability to critically evaluate information on the Internet will contribute to the use of theories of gradual formation of mental actions and developmental learning defined criteria, indicators and levels of students’ ability to critically evaluate information on the Internet.
References
Vukina, N., Dementiievska, N., Sushchenko, I. (2007). Krytychne myslennia: yak tsomu navchaty [Critical thinking: how to teach it]. Kharkiv, Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Dementiievska, N. (1999). Telekomunikatsiini proekty yak odyn iz napriamiv formuvannia krytychnoho myslennia [Telecommunication projects as one of the directions of formation of critical thinking]. Zbirka konspektiv urokiv za metodykamy rozvytku krytychnoho myslennia ta naukovykh statei z problem suchasnoi osvity. Kharkivskyi derzhavnyi peduniversytet imeni H. S. Skovorody – Collection of lesson outlines on methods of developing critical thinking and scientific articles on the problems of modern education. H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, 2, 51‒56 [in Ukrainian].
Ovcharuk, O. V. (2013). Informatsiino-komunikatsiina kompetentnist yak predmet obhovorennia: mizhnarodni pidkhody [Information and communication competence as a subject of discussion: international approaches]. Kompiuter u shkoli ta simi – Computer at school and family, 7, 3‒6 [in Ukrainian].
Bykov, V. Yu. еt al. (2010). Osnovy standartyzatsii informatsiino-komunikatsiinykh kompetentnostei v systemi osvity Ukrainy [Fundamentals of standardization of information and communication competencies in the education system of Ukraine]. Kyiv, Ukraine : Atika [in Ukrainian].
Evdokimov, V. I., Olejnik, T. A., Gorkova, S. A. & Mikityuk, M. V. (2002). Praktikum po razvitiju kriticheskogo myshlenija [Workshop on the development of critical thinking]. Harkov, Ukraine : Tornado [in Russian].
Krouford, A., Caul, V., Metʹju, S. & Makinster, D. (2006). Tekhnolohii rozvytku krytychnoho myslennia [Technologies for the development of critical thinking]. Kyiv, Ukraine : Pleiady [in Ukrainian].
Tiahlo, O. (2008). Krytychne myslennia [Critical thinking]. Kharkiv, Ukraine : Osnova [in Ukrainian].
Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks. Euaropean Commission Joint Research Center. Institute of Prospective Tdechnologies Studies: European Union. 92.
