DETERMINING RECOVERY METHODS IN THE PROCESS OF PHYSICAL EXERCISE

Authors

  • Svitlana Salnykova Candidate of sciences in Physical Education and Sports, Аssociate professor, Head of the Department of Physical Education and Sports, Vinnytsia institute of trade and economics of State University of Trade & Economics https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4675-6105
  • Viktoriia Holovkina Doctor of Philosophy in specialty 017 Physical culture and sport, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Physical Education, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9912-7754
  • Valerii Hazaiev Senior lecturer of the Department of Health and Sports, Dmytro Motornyi Tavria State Agrotechnological University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8702-0300
  • Nadiia Prus Senior lecturer of the Department of Health and Sports Technologies, National Technical University of Ukraine «Kyiv Polytechnic Institute named after Igor Sikorsky» https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9534-9138

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58407/visnik.253313

Keywords:

recovery, physical load, fitness, sport, active recovery, massage, nutrition, sleep, mental techniques, innovative methods, effectiveness, survey

Abstract

The article highlights the relevance of using effective recovery tools in physical exercise routines within the framework of modern physical culture and sport. Post-exercise recovery is considered a key component of the training process that contributes to injury prevention, health maintenance, improved training efficiency, and better sports performance. The aim of the study was to identify the most popular recovery methods and assess awareness of their use among students, athletes, coaches, and fitness enthusiasts. The research applied quantitative methods, including an online survey (n=137). The results showed that active recovery, massage, thermal procedures, and nutritional supplements are the most frequently used. It was found that modern technologies such as electrostimulation and pneumatic compression remain little known among the broader population of practitioners. The findings emphasize the need for further education and scientific-methodological support in implementing modern recovery practices into physical culture, fitness, and sport.

Purpose of the Study. To identify, through a questionnaire survey, the most commonly used recovery methods during physical training among athletes, students, coaches, and fitness enthusiasts, and to assess their experience, perceived effectiveness, and the extent of utilization of modern recovery technologies.

Methodology. Quantitative methods were applied in the study, including an online survey (n=137) conducted among athletes and fitness enthusiasts. The frequency, types, and effectiveness of post-exercise recovery methods were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Scientific Novelty. The study refines current recovery practices within physical culture and sports, particularly among university students and practitioners. It reveals a lack of utilization of innovative recovery technologies, establishing a foundation for further scientific inquiry and optimization of the training process.

Conclusions. Recovery is a crucial component of the sports training process. The survey results confirm the high effectiveness of traditional methods (active recovery, massage, nutrition), while the use of innovative techniques (electrostimulation, cryotherapy) remains limited. Future research should focus on the integration of innovative recovery tools into the daily routines of coaches and athletes.

Published

2025-09-17

Issue

Section

CURRENT TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATION AND PEDAGOGY IN UKRAINE: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND PRACTICAL DIMENSIONS